Upside Down Mortgage

Archive for the ‘Predatory Lending’ Category

Predatory Lending Database Illinois

Regulation of lending institutions is handled primarily by individual states, and this growing industry exists atop an active and shifting legal landscape. Lenders lobby to enable payday lending practices, while opponents of the industry lobby to prohibit the high cost loans in the name of consumer protection.

Payday lending is legal and regulated in 37 states. In Georgia and 12 other states, it is either illegal or not feasible, given state law. When not explicitly banned, laws that prohibit payday lending are usually in the form of usury limits: hard interest rate caps calculated strictly by APR.

In the United States, most states have usury laws which forbid interest rates in excess of a certain APR. Some payday lenders have succeeded in getting around usury laws in some states by forming relationships with nationally-chartered banks based in a different state with no usury ceiling (such as South Dakota or Delaware). This practice has been referred to as “rate exportation”, the “lender/servicer” model, or the “rent-a-bank” model. Under the legal doctrine of interest-rate exportation, established by Marquette Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp. 439 U.S. 299 (1978), the loan is governed by the laws of the state where the bank is chartered, regardless of the borrower’s state of residence. This is the same doctrine that allows credit card issuers based in South Dakota and Delaware states that abolished their usury laws to offer credit cards nationwide. As federal banking regulators became aware of this practice, they began prohibiting these partnerships between commercial banks and payday lenders. The FDIC still allows its member banks to participate in payday lending, but it did issue guidelines in March 2005 that are meant to discourage long term debt cycles by transitioning to a longer term loan after six payday loan renewals. As a result, no federally insured banks engage in the business of payday lending as of 2007 using an agency model.

For usury laws to be effective, they need to include all loan fees as part of the interest. Otherwise, lenders can charge any amount they want as fees and still claim a low interest rate. State laws in the United States generally preclude charging of fees other than those expressly permitted by law, and the federal Truth In Lending Act requires disclosure of all fees. Payday loans, because of their simplified pricing structure, do not contain hidden fees or charges.

Some states have laws limiting the number of loans a borrower can take at a single time. This is currently being accomplished by single, statewide realtime databases. These systems are required in Florida, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, North Dakota, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Virginia. These systems require all licensed lenders to conduct a real time verification of the customer’s eligibility to receive a loan before conducting a loan. Reports published by state regulators in these states indicate that this system enforces all of the provisions of the state’s statutes. Some states also cap the number of loans per borrower per year (Virginia), or require that after a fixed number of loan renewals, the lender must offer a lower interest loan with a longer term, so that the borrower can eventually get out of the debt cycle. Borrowers can circumvent these laws by taking loans from more than one lender if there is not an enforcement mechanism in place by the state. Some states allow that a consumer can have more than one loan outstanding (Oklahoma).

Federal regulation

In the US, although payday lending is primarily regulated at the state level, the United States Congress passed a law in October 2006 becoming effective on Oct. 1, 2007 that caps lending to military personnel at 36% APR as defined by the Secretary of Defense. The Defense Department called payday lending practices “predatory”, and military officers cited concerns that payday lending ruined low-paid enlisted men and women’s finances, jeopardized their security clearances, and even interfered with deployment schedules to Iraq.

Some federal banking regulators and legislators seek to restrict or prohibit the loans not just for military personnel, but for all borrowers, because the high costs are viewed as a financial drain on the working and lower-middle class populations who are the primary borrowers.

About the Author:

Get Fast Payday Loans

Visit Online Payday Loans Now !

Source – Regulations For Payday Loans And Their Effect On Payday Lending

Predatory Lending Tactics

Question: Ameriquest Multistate Settlement in PA?

I have been one of the many thousands of individuals that had the misfortune of refinancing my home through Ameriquest Mortage. Due the predatory lending tactics of these scumbags, I was forced to sell my home to avoid foreclosure and futher damage to my credit.

I have received paper work from the State Attorney General’s office in Pennsylvania in regards to the restitution payment I am able to receive under the multistate settlement against Ameriquest. The minumum amount I am eligible to receive is $320.62, which certainly does not feel like “restitution” to me.

I am curious as to how many Ameriquest borrowers in the state of PA will participate in the multistate settlement or seek other legal action ? Does anyone know of a law firm in PA that has filed for a class action law suit against Ameriquest ?

Regards,
Chris

Answer: Approximately 15,000.

http://www.ameriquestmultistatesettlement.com/index.htm

Howard Nassiri LLP, Predatory Lending

Predatory Lending Act

Question: Isn’t the Bush administration responsible for creating the imminent depression?

In 2003 the Bush administration’s Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), a part of the Department of Treasury, invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to preempt state laws against predatory lending, thereby rendering those state laws inoperative.

The OCC also formulated new rules prohibiting states from enforcing any of their consumer protection laws against national banks.

So anyone who saw what was going on and wanted to try to stop the predatory lending had their hands tied by the Bush administration.

So basically, the Bush administration gave a green light to their financial buddies on Wall Street to rob Americans blind, and drive the US into a recession in the process.

What a big surprise, considering that Bush has ties to the financial industry.

So shouldn’t we be thanking the Bush administration for creating our next depression?

Answer: It is his policies which are at fault, so, yes, Bush would be responsible for the mess that we are currently in.

As far as those who are trying to blame Clinton (don't worry, Clinton has enough blame which should be placed on him with NAFTA) BUSH could have STOPPED whatever Clinton put into place! Another words, Bush is responsible for implementing it. I know that Bush stopped all the clean air laws from going into affect...this is no different!

Is it not interesting that right around 2003 is EXACTLY when we first started having problems with the housing market? Things that make you go, Hmmmmmm.

Rep. Frank - Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act

Predatory Lending In Ohio

Imagine borrowing $50 from your brother to pay the phone bill. The following month your brother comes to you and says you now owe him $450. I know this sounds absurd but I just read an article citing a lady living in Ohio borrowed money from her local Payday Loan lender to buy her child school clothes. She obviously didn’t understand the terms or nature of the note and failed to pay the borrowed amount back on her following payday. The article went on to bash lenders and how they are the vultures of the financial services world. A bit harsh but many legislators and politicians share the same view.

This creates a unique situation. On one side of the divide, you have consumers generally cash poor and in need of services like this. Lawmakers and politicians wage a warlike protest against predatory lending practices in which they believe is the foundation of payday loan lending. Then we have the actual lending companies. They provide the service, make the money and take all the heat.

Do cash advance companies provide a valuable service? Well that depends on who you ask. I find it interesting that the people in opposition of these loan types are for the most part financially well off. Ask the consumer needing money to pay a light bill if he is ok with the finance charges and you’ll know what I’m talking about.

The bottom line is that the poor lady that borrowed the $50 did not pay back the loan as agreed to. In situations like this, it would have been better to not take out the loan. Unfortunately not everyone takes the time to read and/or understand the financial terms.

The good news is that there are many credible payday loan companies that make extra effort to educate their consumers on the ins and outs of personal finance and payday loan basics.

The key to not falling into the same unfortunate trap as the lady mentioned above is to understand your options before you actually need it.

Things to remember:

1. A payday loan is meant to be a short term solution to your emergency cash needs.

2. Be sure to plan for the payback. The loan is borrowed against your next paycheck so you’ll need consider that amount gone from your wages. Many payday loan companies offer an extension option. Be careful! This is where it becomes expensive. You’re better off biting the bullet and paying back the loan in full plus finance charge.

3. Communicate with the lender. Ask questions. Make sure you understand what you are committing to.

About the Author:

Randy San Nicolas is the managing partner of Launchpad Marketing, LLC and owner of http://www.fastmoneyfinder.com and http://www.ultimatecashfinder.com. The sites provide consumers with a Payday” target=”_blank”>www.fastmoneyfinder.com/howitworks.aspx”>Payday Loan matching making service designed to connect lender and borrower.

Source – Debt That Goes From $50 to $450 In Just 30 Days

Predatory Lending In Ohio

Predatory Lending Statute Of Limitations

There are times when people complain about the number of laws there are in this country. How is anyone to keep track when Capitol Hill keeps adding new laws to the statute books? Even the lawyers find it hard to stay on top of all the changes. That leaves ordinary people with no chance at all. Yet, in some areas, the laws can be very helpful to ordinary people. They may not even need to know if government changes the way in which business is regulated. The people can be protected without them ever being aware of it. So the lobbyists start to work. This is big government not little government. This is the nanny state not the rugged individualism that made the US such a great place to live. People should be allowed to stand or fall on their own without the state having to get involved. We have all heard it all before. And the reason this time? Well, there is a bill in the Senate proposing a national cap on the interest rates charged on consumer loans. The maximum annualized rate would be 36%. Needless to say, the loan industry is up in arms. It seems no-one can lend money and make a profit if interest is pegged at such a low figure. So will the law change? Let us go back to 2006 when the Department of Defense persuaded Congress to impose the same cap on all loans made to military personnel. According to the DoD, the families of those in active service were being victimized. Many families were being forced to pay 400% and more in annual interest. Curiously, no-one chose to see the same rates being charged on loans to ordinary people. As it stands, only fifteen states have stepped in to protect their citizens. When people take cash advances against their next pay check, they are so easily caught in a spiral of debt they cannot escape. Those promoting the current bill justify the general cap by saying there will be no cost to the taxpayer and it will save billions of dollars from being sucked out of the pockets of the poorer members of our society. We need to be clear about one thing. Payday loans do serve a useful function. When many are denied access to bank overdrafts and their credit rating is not good enough to get generous limits on their credit cards, these loans can bridge people when there is a financial emergency. The facility is available with few formalities, the money deposited in the bank account the next working day. It is a quick an easy solution to a short-term problem. But, as it stands, the lenders are acting in a predatory way, abusing those who are dependent on their loans. If the bill passes, the maximum interest chargeable on a payday loan will be 36% but states can enact lower limits. In Arkansas, for example, the cap is 17%. Help is on the way so long as the lobbyists do not sideline this protective measure.

About the Author:

David Mayer is a frequent contributor to http://www.one-click-payday-loan.com/where-are-the-laws-in-all-this.html and is a highly regarded writer, having professionally dealt with numerous subjects. Visit the site to read David Mayer’s contributions.

Source – Where are the laws in all this?