Posts Tagged ‘loan-mod’
Loan Modification Advance Fee Agreement
Loan Modification Advance Fee Agreement
When the financial bubble burst, many people’s lives went spinning out of control. Unfamiliar with the fallout they would be facing, homeowners were scrambling for information. Unfortunately, the unscrupulous scammers were just starting to gear up their machines to reel in the catch.
The FBI defines mortgage fraud as "any material misstatement, misrepresentation or omission relied upon by an underwriter or lender to fund, purchase or insure a loan", and there is a plethora of companies doing just that.
There are several organizations across the country that offer rescue plans for people in financial distress. However, incidents such as changing signed documents after the clients leave the office, or other acts of fraud, are all too common.
Some unethical companies may claim to be working in government-sponsored homeowner programs or agencies. Actual or fictional names of government agencies or other official-sounding terms could also be used as the scam artists do their best to appear legitimate.
There is help available for those who have been unfortunate enough to fall prey to these tactics.
If consumers think they have encountered a mortgage fraud situation, or are even suspicious, one of the first stops they can make is the Florida Attorney General's Office. A toll-free Consumer Hotline has been set up, and there is a variety of mortgage- and fraud-related information on their website.
Through its Division of Real Estate, the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation sets rules and guidelines for real estate professionals and exercises disciplinary authority. A Consumer Complaints Section is available to report any incidents people believe to be unethical or illegal conduct by real estate professionals.
HUD, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, also offers consumers the resources they need to make intelligent decisions when it comes to their mortgages.
Here are some points to watch out for when dealing with rescue recovery plans.
Avoid up-front fees:
One prominent scam in play is the requirement for up-front fees by mortgage rescue firms. Consumers facing foreclosure are coerced into paying fees for loan modification or payment rescheduling assistance. All too often, these companies are not legitimate and do nothing to prevent a foreclosure from proceeding. In the end, the homeowner loses the fee, receives no assistance, and forfeits their home.
Because so many have been victimized by this fraud scheme, governments at all levels have put the brakes on these exorbitant fees. The FTC (Federal Trade Commission) recently put out a consumer warning to avoid any company that asks for a large fee in advance, noting it is definitely a red flag to consider. These fees are prohibited in 20 states, with more to come.
While there are a large number of nonprofit agencies that do offer homeowner assistance programs under government sponsorship (usually through HUD), they charge little or no fee for their services.
Leaseback/rent-to-buy scams:
In order to get the consumer to sign on for this scheme, the scam artist offers a deal to have the owner turn over the deed to their property in exchange for a rent-to-own agreement. Supposedly, this will allow the owner to stay where they are and at some point in the future, reclaim their home. Unfortunately, once the deal is signed, the owner may find there are a number of hidden fees and penalties, making it easy for the scam artist to void the deal and evict the owner.
Debt-elimination schemes
In this scenario, the scam artist often claims to be able to eliminate the homeowner’s debt by way of secret laws or other financial trickery known only to his company. When the homeowner buys into this plan, it usually involves a fee for advice, and the owner is convinced to halt their mortgage payments to participate in the false program. This puts the homeowners in a dire position as they end up in a far greater debt situation that is difficult to resolve.
About the Author:
Visit WaterfrontPropertiesAdmiralsCove.com for everything to do with Admirals Cove Jupiter. You'll find information about a range of issues and properties in this beautiful area, including Homes For Sale in the Admirals Cove Golf Village.
Source - Mortgage Frauds Rampant in Florida
If you're new around here, you might want to subscribe to our Upside-Down Mortgage RSS feed. It's quite likely the only feed of it's type on the internet!
Loan Modification Advance Fees
Loan Modification Advance Fees

The California State Senate has passed Senate Bill 94 (”SB 94?), legislation proposed by Sen. Ron S. Calderon (D-Montebello), Chairman of the Banking, Finance & Insurance Committee. The senate passed the bill on May 21, 2009, by a vote of 21 to 14. It is now in the state assembly where it has been read once and “held at desk,” which means that it’s awaiting referral to a committee.
Senate Bill 94 is intended to protect California homeowners from scam loan modification companies.
In my view, the problems with SB 94, as written include:
1. It was created to protect consumers from loan modification “scammers” who charge distressed homeowners up front fees and deliver nothing in return, but it was written without the benefit of accurate data on the contribution being made by the legitimate loan modification industry in California. Without knowing how many homeowners the private sector loan modification firms save each month, or the sustainability of the modifications obtained by the private sector, it would not be possible to design a solution in the best interests of homeowners and the state’s economy.
2. The SB 94 bill, as written, is based on a fundamental misconception. As stated in the in bill’s narrative:
“It is not necessary to pay a third party to arrange for a loan modification or other form of forbearance from your mortgage lender or servicer. You may call your lender directly to ask for a change in your loan terms. Nonprofit housing counseling agencies also offer these and other forms of borrower assistance free of charge.”
While both of these statements are technically true, this language ignores the fact that there are also reputable private sector firms that homeowners may choose to hire to help them negotiate with their banks when seeking a modification of their mortgages. Private sector firms, including those licensed by the state’s Department of Real Estate and/or law firms offering that such services, have helped tens of thousands of California homeowners get their mortgages modified. With the number of foreclosures continuing to increase each month, it would seem clear that the state’s homeowners would not benefit from any legitimate avenue being overlooked or unfairly maligned.
3. Defrauding a homeowner has always been against California law, so in that sense, SB 94 is redundant. When you consider that “scammers” who did in fact defraud consumers in conjunction with the promise of a loan modification, did so in violation of existing law, it would seem that a new law making it illegal to charge an advance fee when offering to assist a homeowner with a loan modification would be unlikely to prevent future scammers from attempting to do the same.
4. Legitimate firms offering to assist troubled homeowners could be regulated and monitored, without requiring these firms to operate at a financial disadvantage by disallowing advance fees. The process of obtaining a loan modification is not similar to other real estate transactions in several key ways:
A. The process can take six weeks, or six months… and in some cases even longer. The lenders and servicers are not consistent in how loan modifications are handled or on what basis they are granted.
B. There is no escrow, or objective standard for “satisfaction,” in conjunction with a loan modification transaction, and therefore there is no assurance that a company would receive payment from the homeowner once the mortgage has been modified.
These are just a few of the issues with SB 94. The law is attempting to protect homeowners, but is actually protecting the lender guaranteeing that homeowners will not be adequately represented when dealing with the lender. The lenders will take advantage of this and will offer homeowners loan modifications that do not help their situation.
About the Author:
Stephen Hoshida is the Manager of the NLA Legal Portal. Mr. Hoshida is responsible for design, research, and management of all information and content contained on NLA’s Legal Portal.
Mr. Hoshida is a graduate of California State University Chico, with a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science. Mr. Hoshida recently completed his Jurist Doctorate at Golden Gate University of San Francisco. While attending law school Mr. Hoshida focused primarily on criminal law, working in the San Francisco County and Butte County District Attorney’s Offices.
Stephen Hoshida
National Loan Auditors, Inc.
http://www.NLAudit.com
Source - Loan Modification Law - California State Senate passes Bill 94
Foreclosure scam, real estate scam Pt 1 of 2